Shoes similar to Brooks Glycerin

The Brooks Glycerin provides a soft and stable ride to neutral runners. Learn which running shoes are similar to the Brooks Glycerin and in what way.

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Brooks Glycerin is a premium neutral cushioning running shoe from Brooks that not only delivers a soft ride but also a good amount of stability to neutral runners.

So to find one or more running shoes that are similar to the Brooks Glycerin The preceding link takes you to Amazon.com, we must look for neutral cushioning running shoes from other manufacturers.

These running shoes must have lots of cushioning, they must provide a good amount of ground contact, a smooth ride, have a secure yet comfortable fit, and add some degree of stability as a neutral running shoe.

While you might find running shoes that come close to all of the features provided by the Brooks Glycerin, there aren't many that will have all of the features.

Hoka One One Clifton

If you are looking for a running shoe that matches or exceeds the amount of cushioning provided by the Brooks Glycerin, you must look into the Hoka One One Clifton.

Women should get about the same amount of heel cushioning from the two running shoes, while the Hoka One One Clifton delivers more forefoot cushioning than the Brooks Glycerin, although the latter does have a cushy forefoot.

Men get a bit more heel cushioning from the Brooks Glycerin, but the Hoka One One Clifton has the cushier forefoot for men.

What is also in a similar range is the amount of stability delivered. Both running shoes deliver an above average amount of stability that come close to each other, with the Hoka One One Clifton being just a tiny bit more stable.

Both running shoes also deliver a good amount of ground contact, which not only helps with stability but also the smoothness of your ride.

The uppers of the two running shoes have been kept light, but both the Brooks Glycerin and the Hoka One One Clifton have no-sew overlays that run throughout the entire upper for a more secure fit.

The Hoka One One Clifton is lighter than the Brooks Glycerin, but the Brooks Glycerin is more flexible than the Hoka One One Clifton, especially for women.

So if you are looking for a running shoe that comes very close to what the Brooks Glycerin provides, the Hoka One One Clifton would be the first one to look into.

You can read more about the differences and similarities between the Brooks Glycerin 15 and the Hoka One One Clifton 4 here.

ASICS GEL-Nimbus

The ASICS GEL-Nimbus is a premium neutral cushioning running shoe just like the Brooks Glycerin, and the two running shoes are meant to be comparable to each other.

While the ASICS GEL-Nimbus has a very cushy heel for women and delivers an above average amount of heel and forefoot cushioning to both genders, the Brooks Glycerin lies above it in overall cushioning delivered.

So you would be able to get a soft ride from the ASICS GEL-Nimbus but not as soft as in the Brooks Glycerin.

Both running shoes are seen as stable neutral cushioning running shoes, with the ASICS GEL-Nimbus being considered a bit more stable than the Brooks Glycerin, perhaps due to the fact that it comes with a midfoot shank and the Brooks Glycerin does not.

In any case, both deliver an above average amount of stability and the difference in stability is not big.

Where the ASICS GEL-Nimbus and the Brooks Glycerin differ is in their uppers.

While both running shoes have no-sew overlays in their uppers, the overlays of the Brooks Glycerin are more complete and run from back to front as well as cover the midfoot.

The overlays of the ASICS GEL-Nimbus are like stitches, so provide lightweight support.

However, the mesh of the ASICS GEL-Nimbus might feel a bit tighter than that of the Brooks Glycerin due to its structure and the way in which it functions, and the ASICS GEL-Nimbus comes with an external heel counter, while the Brooks Glycerin does not.

Another difference is that the Brooks Glycerin provides more ground contact and is more flexible than the ASICS GEL-Nimbus, so you might get a smoother ride in the Brooks Glycerin than in the ASICS GEL-Nimbus.

You can read more about the differences and similarities between the Brooks Glycerin 15 and the ASICS GEL-Nimbus 20 here.

Mizuno Wave Rider

The Mizuno Wave Rider is a neutral cushioning running shoe like the Brooks Glycerin and delivers a good amount of heel cushioning like the Brooks Glycerin.

However, the forefoot of the Mizuno Wave Rider has been kept a little bit more responsive than that of the Brooks Glycerin by delivering an above average amount of forefoot cushioning but not as much as the Brooks Glycerin does.

So while you should be able to get a soft ride from the Mizuno Wave Rider, your ride would be overall softer in the Brooks Glycerin.

Both running shoes are good for heel-strikers, but the Mizuno Wave Rider might be better for women, because it delivers almost a maximum amount of heel cushioning. The amount of heel cushioning is about the same for men in the two running shoes.

The uppers of both running shoes have been kept light with mostly no-sew overlays but have a stitched-on toecap.

The Brooks Glycerin also has more no-sew overlays running throughout its upper, but the Mizuno Wave Rider comes with a stitched-on overlay around the midfoot in the form of the Mizuno logo, so you should be able to get a good amount of support from the upper of either.

The Mizuno Wave Rider has a toe box that is more open and free from overlays than that of the Brooks Glycerin, which has overlays running at its sides, so the Mizuno Wave Rider might deliver more comfort in that area.

The big difference is in the midsole, where the Mizuno Wave Rider has a Wave Plate that also serves as a midfoot shank, and the Brooks Glycerin has an all-in-one midsole that provides a good amount of ground contact.

The Mizuno Wave Rider might not offer the same smoothness and flexibility as the Brooks Glycerin when running, but it is a neutral cushioning running shoe that shares some of the features of the Brooks Glycerin and that might feel more responsive than the Brooks Glycerin.

Brooks Ghost

While the Brooks Ghost is not a premium neutral cushioning running shoe like the Brooks Glycerin, it has several things in common with it due to the fact that it is from the same running shoe manufacturer.

Both the Brooks Ghost and the Brooks Glycerin are stable neutral running shoes, but the Brooks Ghost is a bit more stable according to running shoe lab test results.

The Brooks Glycerin does not lag far behind, though, where the amount of stability is concerned.

The Brooks Ghost delivers somewhat less cushioning than the Brooks Glycerin due to the type of midsole material used.

The difference in cushioning is larger for women than it is for men, though. In fact, the heel of the Brooks Ghost is a bit cushier than that of the Brooks Glycerin for men.

Women get an above average amount of cushioning from the two running shoes, but the Brooks Glycerin is overall just a tad cushier than the Brooks Ghost for women.

While both the Brooks Ghost and the Brooks Glycerin come with 3D printed overlays in their uppers, the Brooks Ghost has them only around the midfoot, while the Brooks Glycerin has them running throughout the entire upper.

The forefoot of the Brooks Ghost has been kept pretty open and free from overlays, which means that it might feel a bit looser and thus also a bit more comfortable than the Brooks Glycerin. Both running shoes come with stitched-on toecaps, though.

They also both provide a good amount of ground contact, deliver a smooth ride, and are similarly flexible, with the Brooks Glycerin being just a tiny bit more flexible than the Brooks Ghost for both men and women.

The Brooks Ghost is a bit lighter than the Brooks Glycerin and might not serve heavier runners as well as the Brooks Glycerin would.

You can read more about the differences and similarities between the Brooks Glycerin 15 and the Brooks Ghost 10 here.

Saucony Zealot ISO

The Saucony Zealot ISO is one of the few neutral cushioning running shoes from Saucony that offers a good amount of cushioning similar to the Brooks Glycerin.

The amount of heel and forefoot cushioning falls in a similar range. Both men and women get a bit more heel cushioning from the Brooks Glycerin and a bit more forefoot cushioning from the Saucony Zealot ISO.

So both running shoes would be good for heel-strikers, but the Brooks Glycerin might feel a bit more responsive than the Saucony Zealot ISO due to the amount of forefoot cushioning.

Where the Brooks Glycerin differs from the Saucony Zealot ISO is in the amount of stability delivered.

While both running shoes provide a good amount of ground contact, which should benefit the smoothness of your ride, the Brooks Glycerin is considered to be a bit more stable than the Saucony Zealot ISO.

The Saucony Zealot ISO delivers an average amount of stability, while the Brooks Glycerin lies far above that amount.

Another difference between these two running shoes can be found in their uppers.

The Brooks Glycerin 15 has more no-sew overlays than the Saucony Zealot ISO and provides a better wrap around the entire foot.

The overlays of the Saucony Zealot ISO have been kept light and more centered around the midfoot.

The Saucony Zealot ISO is an unexpected match, but if cushioning is important to you, it could be a good replacement for the Brooks Glycerin. It is also more flexible and lighter than the Brooks Glycerin.

Mizuno Wave Inspire

While the Mizuno Wave Inspire is a stability running shoe and not a neutral cushioning running shoe, the amount of cushioning it provides is in the range of the Brooks Glycerin and its amount of stability is not over the top.

The amount of heel and forefoot cushioning is about almost the same for men, but women should get just a tiny bit more heel cushioning from the Mizuno Wave Inspire and a tad more forefoot cushioning from the Brooks Glycerin.

The Mizuno Wave Inspire delivers more stability than the Brooks Glycerin, but this is understandable because the Mizuno Wave Inspire is a stability running shoe while the Brooks Glycerin is a neutral running shoe.

However, the amount of stability delivered by the Mizuno Wave Inspire is not to the likes of a Brooks Adrenaline, so it comes much closer to the Brooks Glycerin than the Brooks Adrenaline would.

Unlike the Brooks Glycerin, the Mizuno Wave Inspire has stitched-on overlays around the midfoot, and its forefoot is more open than that of the Brooks Glycerin, so it might feel a bit more comfortable in that area. Both running shoes come with stitched-on toecaps, though.

In the midsole, the Mizuno Wave Inspire has a Wave Plate for pronation control and also to absorb shock at heel-strike, and it does not provide as much ground contact as the Brooks Glycerin.

So overall, the Mizuno Wave Inspire may not deliver a ride that is as smooth as the one delivered by the Brooks Glycerin. It is also a bit stiffer than the Brooks Glycerin.

The Brooks Glycerin is just a tad heavier than the Mizuno Wave Inspire, but their weights come very close to each other for both men and women.

If stability is important to you as a neutral runner, you could look into the Mizuno Wave Inspire, because it can compete with the Brooks Glycerin in the cushioning department.

Note: The weight of a running shoe depends on the size of the running shoe, so any weights mentioned in this review may differ from the weight of the running shoe you choose to wear. Running shoes of the same size were compared for this review.

The two links above will take you to Amazon.com where you can read more about the running shoes.


This review falls under: Brooks

Disclaimer: This running shoe review on www.motioncontrolrunningshoe.org is based on personal research and analysis of data that has been made publicly available by running shoe manufacturers and other companies that are dedicated to serving runners, and is not claimed to be accurate, complete, or up to date. While the information presented in this review is intended to help you better understand the differences between running shoes, we shall not be held liable for any purchasing decisions you make based on this information. Please use your own good judgment before making a purchase. The owner of this website receives a small compensation whenever you buy a product after clicking a product link on this website. Read our full disclaimer and privacy policy.